Gaussian Mixture Models vs. K-Means Clustering: Which One to Use

December 01, 2022

Data clustering is an essential part of machine learning, which involves grouping similar data points into clusters. The clustering algorithm performs this task by finding patterns in the given data and identifying the relationships between the clusters. Two popular clustering algorithms are Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM) and K-Means Clustering. While both algorithms are widely used for clustering, they differ in their approach and application. In this article, we'll compare these two algorithms and highlight their similarities and differences.


K-Means Clustering is a simple and fast clustering algorithm that divides the dataset into K clusters. It assigns each data point to the nearest centroid, and computes the average of each cluster. In contrast, GMM is a probabilistic model that fits multiple Gaussian distributions to the dataset. It finds the likelihood of each data point belonging to each cluster and calculates their probabilities.

Similarities Between GMM and K-Means Clustering

GMM and K-Means Clustering share some commonalities, including:

Both Algorithms Cluster Data

Both algorithms group similar data points into clusters.

Both Can Handle Large Datasets

Both algorithms can handle large datasets efficiently, making them popular choices in machine learning.

Both Depend on Initialization

Both GMM and K-Means clustering depend on initialization, which means that the starting point for the algorithms affects their accuracy, efficiency, and performance.

Differences Between GMM and K-Means Clustering

GMM and K-Means Clustering have several differences, including:


The primary difference between the two algorithms is their approach. GMM is a probabilistic model that assumes each cluster follows a Gaussian distribution. In contrast, K-Means Clustering assigns each data point to the nearest centroid based on Euclidean distance.


GMM is more flexible than K-Means Clustering since it tends to assign data points to clusters probabilistically with varying levels of certainty. In contrast, K-Means Clustering assigns each data point to a cluster deterministically.


K-Means Clustering is more scalable than GMM since it is less complex and requires fewer computations.


GMM performs better when the dataset is not separable using linear boundaries, while K-Means Clustering works well when the clusters are compact, well-separated, and have spherical shapes.

When to Use GMM and K-Means Clustering

Based on the differences between the two algorithms, it is clear that they have different strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, choosing between the two requires consideration of the nature of the data and the clustering task's requirements. Here are some guidelines to help you choose between the two algorithms:

Use GMM When:

  • You have a large dataset that follows a Gaussian distribution.
  • You require flexible and probabilistic clustering.
  • You need high precision in cluster assignments, especially when the data is not linearly separable.

Use K-Means Clustering When:

  • You have a small dataset or a large dataset with well-separated, compact clusters.
  • You need a less complex algorithm that runs faster.
  • You require deterministic cluster assignments.


Gaussian Mixture Models and K-Means Clustering are two popular machine learning algorithms for data clustering. While both algorithms share similarities, such as their ability to cluster data effectively and handle large datasets, they differ in their approach, flexibility, scalability, and performance. Choosing between the two algorithms requires careful consideration of the data and the clustering task's requirements. We hope this article has provided you with a better understanding of the differences between GMM and K-Means Clustering and when to use each algorithm.


[1] Alina Chetverikova. "Unsupervised Machine Learning: Gaussian Mixture Models." Codecademy, 2021. [Online]. Available:
[2] George Seif. "Gaussian Mixture Models: A Complete Guide to Unsupervised Learning in Python." Medium, 2020. [Online]. Available:
[3] R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, "Chapter 9. Cluster Analysis," in Pattern Classification, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001, pp. 408-496.
[4] S. Lloyd, "Least squares quantization in PCM," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 129-137, 1982.
[5] UCI Machine Learning Repository, "Iris Dataset." [Online]. Available:

© 2023 Flare Compare